OpenBOR

OpenBOR 4.0 7556

No permission to download
Overview Updates (4) Reviews (3) History Discussion
DarthMotzkus said:
I`m getting this after run .bat:
View attachment 10070
Click to expand...

I was afraid of that. We recently had one of the older (and FAR more knowledgeable than myself) devs show up (@SX), and he tried to modernize the compiling. problem is, none of us could ever get it to work even with his help. Supposedly the original batch build would still run as a fallback, but I guess not. I took a bit of time off after the 4.0 release to work on my own projects and haven't messed with it any. I'll have to go in and revert those changes (I'll put them into another branch so they won't be gone), and see if I can get the batch build going again. It won't be this week though, I'm kind of buried in some post grad work ATM.

DC
 
Tried to build
DCurrent said:
I was afraid of that. We recently had one of the older (and FAR more knowledgeable than myself) devs show up (@SX), and he tried to modernize the compiling. problem is, none of us could ever get it to work even with his help. Supposedly the original batch build would still run as a fallback, but I guess not. I took a bit of time off after the 4.0 release to work on my own projects and haven't messed with it any. I'll have to go in and revert those changes (I'll put them into another branch so they won't be gone), and see if I can get the batch build going again. It won't be this week though, I'm kind of buried in some post grad work ATM.

DC
Click to expand...
I've tried to build with linux bash build.sh, that's the output:

1737555803253.png
1737555984845.png
 
followed SX's compile instructions and managed to build the windows x86 and x64, linux x86, x64, arm64. then i get a error.

Code: 
CMake Error: The current CMakeCache.txt directory /workspace/CMakeCache.txt is different than the directory /home/malik/Downloads/openbor-master where CMakeCache.txt was created. This may result in binaries being created in the wrong place. If you are not sure, reedit the CMakeCache.txt

This needs to be trouble shooted with @SX .
 
msmalik681 said:
followed SX's compile instructions and managed to build the windows x86 and x64, linux x86, x64, arm64. then i get a error.

Code: 
CMake Error: The current CMakeCache.txt directory /workspace/CMakeCache.txt is different than the directory /home/malik/Downloads/openbor-master where CMakeCache.txt was created. This may result in binaries being created in the wrong place. If you are not sure, reedit the CMakeCache.txt

This needs to be trouble shooted with @SX .
Click to expand...

Probably need to send him a direct mail. My host is still getting blocked by gmail, and @SX is using a gmail address - meaning he's not probably getting tag alerts. I've had that ticket open a while - need to pound on them a little bit. I'm paying through the nose for high end hosting service, and that's unacceptable.

DC
 
I am pretty sure when SX added the new make option for compiling he did not take anything away from the current windows building system.

@DCurrent if you check compiling.md it mentions you can setup using VSCODE.
 
Last edited:
msmalik681 said:
I am pretty sure when SX added the new make option for compiling he did not take anything away from the current windows building system.

@DCurrent if you check compiling.md it mentions you can setup using VSCODE.
Click to expand...

Yes, but it's a convoluted set up through Docker that even after @SX walked me through in a live meeting I could never replicate on my own. Which, for a while I just figured was me being a moron - thing is though, nobody else can make it work either.

DC
 
DCurrent said:
@Kratus had a prepared release IIRC
Click to expand...
@DCurrent Yes, I prepared a zip file which contains the executable for the three main 7612 builds (Windows/Linux/Android).
However, I'm not too familiar with the "new builds" launch process in GitHub at the "tags" section.

1738015392381.png

In addition, above the build 7612 I saw many new updates not only related to the new compilation process, at least from my part I couldn't test and don't know if everything is working fine.
 
I am trying out the new functions in 4.0, why this is not working?
It is giving me an error message.
Code: 
int FrozenStatus = get_entity_property(target, openborconstant(ENTITY_PROPERTY_FREEZE_STATE));
Thank you
 
Bruce said:
I am trying out the new functions in 4.0, why this is not working?
It is giving me an error message.
Code: 
int FrozenStatus = get_entity_property(target, openborconstant(ENTITY_PROPERTY_FREEZE_STATE));
Thank you
Click to expand...
I didn't test but if I'm not wrong there's some new v4 properties under development. Optionally you can use v3 functions too.

Code: 
int frozen = getentityproperty(target, "frozen");
 
I know these weren't possible in any version prior to V 4.0
Is it possible to check if the enemy is the boss type in V 4.xx?
I mean we can declare the enemy as the boss in the level.txt,
I just don't see why we can not have a way to check this?

Furthermore, is it possible to get the current playing music name or resume the music after playing webm videos without scripts?
Right now I am doing all kind of scripts and tricks just to get this playing music name.
We all know that after playing webm videos, the music stops....

I know V 4.xx is still at the early stage, so I hope someday someone finds a way to code these,
thank you everyone for your hard work and god bless you all!
 
Bruce said:
I know these weren't possible in any version prior to V 4.0
Click to expand...

Uhm... No, you don't know. And I would appreciate you not making assertions until you have the correct information because that can confuse other members. See below:

Bruce said:
Is it possible to check if the enemy is the boss type in V 4.xx?
I mean we can declare the enemy as the boss in the level.txt,
I just don't see why we can not have a way to check this?
Click to expand...

Not only have you always been able to tell if an entity was a boss or not, you can also change the boss property mid game.

C-like: 
// V3 method (still works in 4)
int boss = getentityproperty(<entity>, "boss");

changeentityproperty(<entity>, "boss", <int>);

// V4 method (faster)
int boss = get_entity_property(<entity>, openborconstant("ENTITY_PROPERTY_BOSS"));

set_entity_property(<entity>, openborconstant("ENTITY_PROPERTY_BOSS"), <int>);

There's also a level count that tells you how many bosses are active at the moment.

Bruce said:
Furthermore, is it possible to get the current playing music name or resume the music after playing webm videos without scripts?
Click to expand...

Sorry, but that doesn't make any logical sense. How would you "get" a value of any kind without script? So no.

DC
 
DCurrent said:
Uhm... No, you don't know. And I would appreciate you not making assertions until you have the correct information because that can confuse other members. See below:
Click to expand...
Sorry, my apologies for my newbie dummy - I will be very careful about this next time.

DCurrent said:
Sorry, but that doesn't make any logical sense. How would you "get" a value of any kind without script? So no.
Click to expand...
Sorry please ignore the part "get"... what I meant was the native functions/commands something like resume_music without script.
For example, resume_stage_music or resume_boss_music. etc..

Even with the script, is there a way to get the stage music name or boss music name?

Thank you for your help.
 
Bruce said:
is there a way to get the stage music
Click to expand...
In short, no. However you can play music through the playmusic() function and then you can save the current music name or number into a variable.

A tip: Try to focus more on reaching the final result instead of focusing too much on the used method, this can improve your development. Sometimes there's no direct solution with native functions, but you can always try alternatives using scripts.
 
Kratus said:
In short, no. However you can play music through the playmusic() function and then you can save the current music name or number into a variable.

A tip: Try to focus more on reaching the final result instead of focusing too much on the used method, this can improve your development. Sometimes there's no direct solution with native functions, but you can always try alternatives using scripts.
Click to expand...
I really appreciate for your help and the tip.
 
Last edited:
There is a little issue/typo in ondoattackscript : as you can see below sometimes the local var referring to the "attack ID" is accessed through "attackid", and sometimes "attack_id".

In most tutorials I saw this var is accessed through "attackid", but currently you actually have to use "attack_id", otherwise you'll get a null value. It's only cleaned as "attackid".

Code: 
void execute_ondoattack_script(entity *ent, entity *other, s_attack *attack, e_exchange which, int attack_id)
{
    ScriptVariant tempvar;
    Script *cs = ent->scripts->ondoattack_script;
    if(Script_IsInitialized(cs))
    {
        ScriptVariant_Init(&tempvar);
        ScriptVariant_ChangeType(&tempvar, VT_PTR);
        tempvar.ptrVal = (VOID *)ent;
        Script_Set_Local_Variant(cs, "self",        &tempvar);

        tempvar.ptrVal = (VOID *)other;
        Script_Set_Local_Variant(cs, "other",    &tempvar);

        ScriptVariant_ChangeType(&tempvar, VT_INTEGER);

        tempvar.lVal = (LONG)attack->attack_force;
        Script_Set_Local_Variant(cs, "damage",      &tempvar);

        tempvar.lVal = (LONG)attack->attack_drop;
        Script_Set_Local_Variant(cs, "drop",        &tempvar);

        tempvar.lVal = (LONG)attack->attack_type;
        Script_Set_Local_Variant(cs, "attacktype",  &tempvar);

        tempvar.lVal = (LONG)attack->no_block;
        Script_Set_Local_Variant(cs, "noblock",     &tempvar);

        tempvar.lVal = (LONG)attack->guardcost;
        Script_Set_Local_Variant(cs, "guardcost",   &tempvar);

        tempvar.lVal = (LONG)attack->jugglecost;
        Script_Set_Local_Variant(cs, "jugglecost",  &tempvar);

        tempvar.lVal = (LONG)attack->pause_add;
        Script_Set_Local_Variant(cs, "pauseadd",    &tempvar);

        tempvar.lVal = (LONG)attack->meta_tag;
        Script_Set_Local_Variant(cs, "tag",    &tempvar);

        tempvar.lVal = (LONG)which;
        Script_Set_Local_Variant(cs, "which",    &tempvar);

        tempvar.lVal = (LONG)attack_id;
        Script_Set_Local_Variant(cs, "attack_id",    &tempvar);

        Script_Execute(cs);
        //clear to save variant space
        ScriptVariant_Clear(&tempvar);
        Script_Set_Local_Variant(cs, "self",        &tempvar);
        Script_Set_Local_Variant(cs, "other",        &tempvar);
        Script_Set_Local_Variant(cs, "damage",      &tempvar);
        Script_Set_Local_Variant(cs, "drop",        &tempvar);
        Script_Set_Local_Variant(cs, "attacktype",  &tempvar);
        Script_Set_Local_Variant(cs, "noblock",     &tempvar);
        Script_Set_Local_Variant(cs, "guardcost",   &tempvar);
        Script_Set_Local_Variant(cs, "jugglecost",  &tempvar);
        Script_Set_Local_Variant(cs, "pauseadd",    &tempvar);
        Script_Set_Local_Variant(cs, "which",        &tempvar);
        Script_Set_Local_Variant(cs, "attackid",    &tempvar);
        Script_Set_Local_Variant(cs, "tag",            &tempvar);
    }
}
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom