O Ilusionista
Captain 100K
I got your point, but one of the things which made Stats a hit was the incorporated manual.If I may, please... please don't do that. That's one of things that looks great on paper, but never work in practice.
And as I update the manual for years, I can say that there was information there which wasn't present on the manual.
My idea wasn't to include the whole manual, just some tiddybits so people could understand (or remember) what they are about to change.
For example, you have "jumpframe" and, once you hover the mouse, a popup would appear saying:
Just that, nothing more. I constantly forget if X or Z comes first, for example.jumpframe {frame} {speedy} {speedx} {speedz} {dust}
We could have a READ MORE link with the link to the said information on the wiki, but I am afraid that link changes will screw this up - the sole reason I use DCEmulation manual is because its the same link since forever, while the official one have changed its url many times down the years.
That is my main concern.
But since many things will change in the next 4.0 build, maybe this idea won't work (or, at least, it won't be a good idea to make it now).
As an example, we will move from this:
no_adjust_base 1
subject_to_gravity 1
subject_to_max_z 1
]subject_to_min_z 1
to this:
move_constraints no_adjust_base subject_to_gravity subject_to_max_z subject_to_min_z
Which will render the documentation outdated.
Sorry, but I don't see the point of having this. If I need to download a file and make it searchable...its better to have it online anyway.Manual at hand and having it in software is just one less windows to clutter desktop so... how about a normal html/pdf/txt viewer panel that will just open html or txt or whatever, and we can just put the manual as html, pdf or txt ourselves in one of the folders so its our choice ?
And the searchbox woud be automated so we type in command and it already appears without havin to enter
A searchable so we can search for anything inside manual but also edit the manual ourselves maybe not in program itself but like a normal html or txt.
But I agree with you of being better to have an offline solution.
I don't want to sound boring, but I don't see the point in this either. We already support drag and drop, which is much faster.About the path creating thing, IMO fastest is just having one line and clicking a button to autogenerate next lines
Currently, it only works with images - if you try to drag a sound file, it creates a line with "frame" instead of "sound". That could be interesting to have in the tool.














